Doing research with intellectually disabled participants: reflections on the challenges of capacity and consent in socio-legal research

Rosie Harding

doi:10.1111/jols.12331

Doing research with intellectually disabled participants: reflections on the challenges of capacity and consent in socio-legal research

Rosie Harding

Birmingham Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, I reflect on the praxis of doing qualitative interview research involving intellectually disabled people as participants. I explore the ways in which ethical and legal norms work together to shape what is possible in research with intellectually disabled participants. I use stories from the field to explore issues of recruitment and sampling, working with ‘gatekeeper’ organizations, accessible information and informed consent, and data sharing and open access. As these reflections demonstrate, undertaking fieldwork involving intellectually disabled participants presents multiple challenges for socio-legal researchers. They also show that many of the challenges are surmountable, offering concerns, considerations, and solutions that can, and perhaps should, be considered by all socio-legal researchers who wish to ensure that all of the voices of society are included and reflected in their research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	S28-S43
Number of pages	16
Journal	Journal of Law and Society
Volume	48
Issue number	S1
Early online date	16 Dec 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12331
Publication status	Published - 17 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
‘Everyday Decisions: Interrogating the Interface between Mental Capacity and Legal Capacity’ funded by British Academy Mid‐Career Fellowship (MCF150026); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @UoB ‘Supported Will‐Making’ (2017); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @ UoB ‘CLARiTY: Capacity Law and Rights Information to You’; further research also supported by a Philip Leverhulme Prize from the Leverhulme Trust.

Funding Information:
I would like to thank Linda Mulcahy, Rachel Cahill‐O'Callaghan, and Anna Bryson for their comments on an earlier draft of this article. I am grateful to the British Academy, the Leverhulme Trust, and the ESRC IAA at the University of Birmingham for financial support for aspects of the research reported here.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Law and Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cardiff University (CU)

Keywords

Law
Sociology and Political Science

Access to Document

10.1111/jols.12331Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

HardingR2021DoingFinal published version, 215 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

Philip Leverhulme Prize - Law
Harding, R. (Principal Investigator)
Leverhulme Trust
1/09/18 → 31/12/26
Project: Research

Cite this

@article{d54388cc15b54d338717b801f1eaecf3,

title = "Doing research with intellectually disabled participants: reflections on the challenges of capacity and consent in socio-legal research",

abstract = "In this article, I reflect on the praxis of doing qualitative interview research involving intellectually disabled people as participants. I explore the ways in which ethical and legal norms work together to shape what is possible in research with intellectually disabled participants. I use stories from the field to explore issues of recruitment and sampling, working with {\textquoteleft}gatekeeper{\textquoteright} organizations, accessible information and informed consent, and data sharing and open access. As these reflections demonstrate, undertaking fieldwork involving intellectually disabled participants presents multiple challenges for socio-legal researchers. They also show that many of the challenges are surmountable, offering concerns, considerations, and solutions that can, and perhaps should, be considered by all socio-legal researchers who wish to ensure that all of the voices of society are included and reflected in their research.",

keywords = "Law, Sociology and Political Science",

author = "Rosie Harding",

note = "Funding Information: {\textquoteleft}Everyday Decisions: Interrogating the Interface between Mental Capacity and Legal Capacity{\textquoteright} funded by British Academy Mid‐Career Fellowship (MCF150026); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @UoB {\textquoteleft}Supported Will‐Making{\textquoteright} (2017); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @ UoB {\textquoteleft}CLARiTY: Capacity Law and Rights Information to You{\textquoteright}; further research also supported by a Philip Leverhulme Prize from the Leverhulme Trust. Funding Information: I would like to thank Linda Mulcahy, Rachel Cahill‐O'Callaghan, and Anna Bryson for their comments on an earlier draft of this article. I am grateful to the British Academy, the Leverhulme Trust, and the ESRC IAA at the University of Birmingham for financial support for aspects of the research reported here. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors. Journal of Law and Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cardiff University (CU)",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

day = "17",

doi = "10.1111/jols.12331",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "S28--S43",

journal = "Journal of Law and Society",

issn = "0263-323X",

publisher = "Wiley Online Library",

number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Doing research with intellectually disabled participants

T2 - reflections on the challenges of capacity and consent in socio-legal research

AU - Harding, Rosie

N1 - Funding Information: ‘Everyday Decisions: Interrogating the Interface between Mental Capacity and Legal Capacity’ funded by British Academy Mid‐Career Fellowship (MCF150026); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @UoB ‘Supported Will‐Making’ (2017); ESRC Impact Acceleration Account @ UoB ‘CLARiTY: Capacity Law and Rights Information to You’; further research also supported by a Philip Leverhulme Prize from the Leverhulme Trust. Funding Information: I would like to thank Linda Mulcahy, Rachel Cahill‐O'Callaghan, and Anna Bryson for their comments on an earlier draft of this article. I am grateful to the British Academy, the Leverhulme Trust, and the ESRC IAA at the University of Birmingham for financial support for aspects of the research reported here. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Law and Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cardiff University (CU)

PY - 2022/1/17

Y1 - 2022/1/17

N2 - In this article, I reflect on the praxis of doing qualitative interview research involving intellectually disabled people as participants. I explore the ways in which ethical and legal norms work together to shape what is possible in research with intellectually disabled participants. I use stories from the field to explore issues of recruitment and sampling, working with ‘gatekeeper’ organizations, accessible information and informed consent, and data sharing and open access. As these reflections demonstrate, undertaking fieldwork involving intellectually disabled participants presents multiple challenges for socio-legal researchers. They also show that many of the challenges are surmountable, offering concerns, considerations, and solutions that can, and perhaps should, be considered by all socio-legal researchers who wish to ensure that all of the voices of society are included and reflected in their research.

AB - In this article, I reflect on the praxis of doing qualitative interview research involving intellectually disabled people as participants. I explore the ways in which ethical and legal norms work together to shape what is possible in research with intellectually disabled participants. I use stories from the field to explore issues of recruitment and sampling, working with ‘gatekeeper’ organizations, accessible information and informed consent, and data sharing and open access. As these reflections demonstrate, undertaking fieldwork involving intellectually disabled participants presents multiple challenges for socio-legal researchers. They also show that many of the challenges are surmountable, offering concerns, considerations, and solutions that can, and perhaps should, be considered by all socio-legal researchers who wish to ensure that all of the voices of society are included and reflected in their research.

KW - Law

KW - Sociology and Political Science

U2 - 10.1111/jols.12331

DO - 10.1111/jols.12331

M3 - Article

SN - 0263-323X

VL - 48

SP - S28-S43

JO - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

IS - S1

ER -

Doing research with intellectually disabled participants: reflections on the challenges of capacity and consent in socio-legal research

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Philip Leverhulme Prize - Law

Cite this