Disruption Management of Resource Schedule in Transportation Sector: Understanding the Concept and Strategy

Mohd Haniff Osman; Sakdirat Kaewunruen; Min An; Serdar Dindar

doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592

Disruption Management of Resource Schedule in Transportation Sector: Understanding the Concept and Strategy

Mohd Haniff Osman, Sakdirat Kaewunruen, Min An, Serdar Dindar

Civil Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

191 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Disruption in a schedule (or plan) can be managed but not all factors are visible. A study of disruption management is performed specifically to minimize the differences between the expected and actual context of execution. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first to offer an introduction and deliver a concept of disruption management in the transportation sector. Second, we aim to understand challenges in a rescheduling strategy to manage disruption in the area of resource scheduling. Real world applications from airline to railway services are used as a basis of the investigation. A discussion on the future development of disruption management with a focus on rail track inspection is provided in the final part of this paper.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1295–1299
Number of pages	5
Journal	Procedia Engineering
Volume	161
Early online date	18 Oct 2016
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592
Publication status	Published - 2016
Event	World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium 2016: WMCAUS 2016 - Prague, Czech Republic Duration: 13 Jun 2016 → 17 Jun 2016

Keywords

track inspection schedule
scheduling
rescheduling
disruption management
low probability event

Access to Document

10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

Bin_Osman_Disruption_Management_Procedia_EngineeringFinal published version, 191 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND)

1 Citations
1 Paper

Cost-benefit indicator for rescheduling railway track inspection
Osman, M. H. & Kaewunruen, S., 29 Apr 2017. 8 p.
Research output: Contribution to conference (unpublished) › Paper

Cite this

@article{627b5d7c2d924fcfb24493ed6a8c5435,

title = "Disruption Management of Resource Schedule in Transportation Sector: Understanding the Concept and Strategy",

abstract = "Disruption in a schedule (or plan) can be managed but not all factors are visible. A study of disruption management is performed specifically to minimize the differences between the expected and actual context of execution. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first to offer an introduction and deliver a concept of disruption management in the transportation sector. Second, we aim to understand challenges in a rescheduling strategy to manage disruption in the area of resource scheduling. Real world applications from airline to railway services are used as a basis of the investigation. A discussion on the future development of disruption management with a focus on rail track inspection is provided in the final part of this paper.",

keywords = "track inspection schedule, scheduling, rescheduling, disruption management, low probability event",

author = "Osman, {Mohd Haniff} and Sakdirat Kaewunruen and Min An and Serdar Dindar",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592",

language = "English",

volume = "161",

pages = "1295–1299",

journal = "Procedia Engineering",

issn = "1877-7058",

publisher = "Elsevier Korea",

note = "World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium 2016 : WMCAUS 2016 ; Conference date: 13-06-2016 Through 17-06-2016",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disruption Management of Resource Schedule in Transportation Sector: Understanding the Concept and Strategy

AU - Osman, Mohd Haniff

AU - Kaewunruen, Sakdirat

AU - An, Min

AU - Dindar, Serdar

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Disruption in a schedule (or plan) can be managed but not all factors are visible. A study of disruption management is performed specifically to minimize the differences between the expected and actual context of execution. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first to offer an introduction and deliver a concept of disruption management in the transportation sector. Second, we aim to understand challenges in a rescheduling strategy to manage disruption in the area of resource scheduling. Real world applications from airline to railway services are used as a basis of the investigation. A discussion on the future development of disruption management with a focus on rail track inspection is provided in the final part of this paper.

AB - Disruption in a schedule (or plan) can be managed but not all factors are visible. A study of disruption management is performed specifically to minimize the differences between the expected and actual context of execution. The purpose of this paper is twofold: first to offer an introduction and deliver a concept of disruption management in the transportation sector. Second, we aim to understand challenges in a rescheduling strategy to manage disruption in the area of resource scheduling. Real world applications from airline to railway services are used as a basis of the investigation. A discussion on the future development of disruption management with a focus on rail track inspection is provided in the final part of this paper.

KW - track inspection schedule

KW - scheduling

KW - rescheduling

KW - disruption management

KW - low probability event

U2 - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592

DO - 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.592

M3 - Article

SN - 1877-7058

VL - 161

SP - 1295

EP - 1299

JO - Procedia Engineering

JF - Procedia Engineering

T2 - World Multidisciplinary Civil Engineering-Architecture-Urban Planning Symposium 2016

Y2 - 13 June 2016 through 17 June 2016

ER -

Disruption Management of Resource Schedule in Transportation Sector: Understanding the Concept and Strategy

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Cost-benefit indicator for rescheduling railway track inspection

Cite this