‘Discourses of ‘Fair Access’ in English Higher Education: what do institutional statements tell us about university stratification and market positioning?’

Marion Bowl, Jonathan Hughes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper explores English universities’ responses to widening participation policy developments. It draws on an analysis of Access Agreements submitted to the Office for Fair Access (OFFA) - and publicly-available material produced by eight universities in one region. We analyse how universities from different mission groups present their commitment to widening participation and how this relates to their positioning in a stratified, marketised system. Our analysis reveals that, in spite of government rhetoric , OFFA appears willing to accept a variety of arrangements for offsetting the impact of increased fees on students from under-represented backgrounds. We suggest that a combination of government direction and institutional discretion enables universities to use financial incentives as marketing tools. We conclude that English universities, reflecting the uncertain policy climate and market concerns, are taking a cautious and ambivalent approach to fair access, signalling retreat from higher education as a vehicle for promoting social justice.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalWidening Participation and Lifelong Learning
    Volume16
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • widening participation.
    • Higher Education
    • document analysis
    • fair access
    • marketisation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '‘Discourses of ‘Fair Access’ in English Higher Education: what do institutional statements tell us about university stratification and market positioning?’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this