Disagreement, equal weight and commutativity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
186 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How should we respond to cases of disagreement where two epistemic agents have the same evidence but come to different conclusions? Adam Elga has provided a Bayesian framework for addressing this question. In this paper, I shall highlight two unfortunate consequences of this framework, which Elga does not anticipate. Both problems derive from a failure of commutativity between application of the equal weight view and updating in the light of other evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-326
Number of pages6
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume149
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2009

Cite this