Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dietary double-think

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article discusses how difficult it is to be morally consistent when choosing what to eat. Applying a moral justification in a consistent manner may result in some unorthodox diets. I distinguish two ways in which we might be inconsistent in our approach to food. We might fail to apply our morals in a consistent way, or we might fail to put our morals into practice at all. I argue that the latter represents a greater failing. Given the complexity of making food choices, the former is more excusable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-80
Number of pages6
JournalThink (UK)
Volume18
Issue number52
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary double-think'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this