Abstract
This article discusses how difficult it is to be morally consistent when choosing what to eat. Applying a moral justification in a consistent manner may result in some unorthodox diets. I distinguish two ways in which we might be inconsistent in our approach to food. We might fail to apply our morals in a consistent way, or we might fail to put our morals into practice at all. I argue that the latter represents a greater failing. Given the complexity of making food choices, the former is more excusable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 75-80 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Think (UK) |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 52 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2019.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary double-think'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver