Dental treatment needs in the Canadian population: analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Chantel Ramraj, Amir Azarpazhooh, Laura Dempster, Vahid Ravaghi, Carlos Quiñonez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
250 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Nationally representative clinical data on the oral health needs of Canadians has not been available since the 1970s. The purpose of this study was to determine the normative treatment needs of a nationally representative sample of Canadians and describe how these needs were distributed.

Methods
A secondary analysis of data collected through the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) was undertaken. Sampling and bootstrap weights were applied to make the data nationally representative. Descriptive frequencies were used to examine the sample characteristics and to examine the treatment type(s) needed by the population. Bivariate logistic regressions were used to see if any characteristics were predictive of having an unmet dental treatment need, and of having specific treatment needs. Lastly, multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the strongest predictors of having an unmet dental treatment need.

Results
Most of the population had no treatment needs and of the 34.2% who did, most needed restorative (20.4%) and preventive (13.7%) care. The strongest predictors of need were having poor oral health, reporting a self-perceived need for treatment and visiting the dentist infrequently.

Conclusions
It is estimated that roughly 12 million Canadians have at least one unmet dental treatment need. Policymakers now have information by which to assess if programs match the dental treatment needs of Canadians and of particular subgroups experiencing excess risk.
Original languageEnglish
Article number46
JournalBMC oral health
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dental treatment needs in the Canadian population: analysis of a nationwide cross-sectional survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this