Demography, dynamics and data: building confidence for simulating changes in the world's forests

  • Annemarie H. Eckes‐Shephard*
  • , Arthur P. K. Argles
  • , Bogdan Brzeziecki
  • , Peter M. Cox
  • , Martin G. De Kauwe
  • , Adriane Esquivel‐Muelbert
  • , Rosie A. Fisher
  • , George C. Hurtt
  • , Jürgen Knauer
  • , Charles D. Koven
  • , Aleksi Lehtonen
  • , Sebastiaan Luyssaert
  • , Laura Marqués
  • , Lei Ma
  • , Guillaume Marie
  • , Jonathan R. Moore
  • , Jessica F. Needham
  • , Stefan Olin
  • , Mikko Peltoniemi
  • , Karl Piltz
  • Hisashi Sato, Stephen Sitch, Benjamin D. Stocker, Ensheng Weng, Daniel Zuleta, Thomas A. M. Pugh
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Summary: Vegetation demographic models (VDMs) are advanced tools for simulating forest responses to climate and land‐use changes, and are essential for projecting carbon cycling and large‐scale forest management strategies. Despite their increasing incorporation into Earth System Models, VDMs differ in their demographic assumptions, with no prior quantitative comparison of their performance. We benchmarked nine VDMs against observational data from boreal, temperate and tropical sites, assessing their accuracy in predicting tree growth, carbon turnover, biomass stocks and size distributions. Models were simulated under consistent climate conditions with postdisturbance recovery monitored for at least 420 yr. Postdisturbance carbon recovery trajectories showed significant variability while remaining within observational ranges. Initial regrowth rates varied substantially (0.03–0.60, 0.18–0.70 and 0.35–1.10 kgCm−2 yr−1 for boreal, temperate and tropical sites, respectively), influenced by each model's initial forest state. Models captured mature forest carbon content but showed compensating effects between overestimated growth and underestimated mortality rates. This first multi‐model benchmarking identifies growth and mortality rates as critical calibration targets and highlights the need to refine postdisturbance establishment conditions for model development. We outline specific benchmarking variables needed to improve predictions of forest responses to environmental change.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNew Phytologist
Early online date23 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Oct 2025

Keywords

  • model intercomparison
  • demographic vegetation model benchmarking
  • postdisturbance recovery
  • self‐thinning
  • forest demography
  • land‐surface modelling
  • growth–mortality dynamics
  • vegetation carbon

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Demography, dynamics and data: building confidence for simulating changes in the world's forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this