Research output per year
Research output per year
Brandon Ashinoff, Joy Geng, Carmel Mevorach
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Previous studies have tended to infer that reactive control is intact in aging populations because of evidence that proactive control is impaired and that older participants appear to favor reactive control strategies. However, most of these studies did not compare reactive control in young and older participants directly. In our study, a young (18 to 21 years old) and older (60+ years old) cohort engaged in a task that assesses reactive distractor suppression where participants had to discriminate between an upright and inverted T-shape in the presence of a salient or nonsalient distractor. In previous studies using this paradigm (DiQuattro & Geng, 2011) young participants reactively used the salient distractor as an anticue and performed better (faster reaction time [RT] and higher accuracy) when it was present. It was found that older participants were not able to reactively suppress the salient distractor with a 200-ms display but were able to do so with a 600-ms display. It was concluded that the initiation of reactive suppression is delayed for older participants, but that effective suppression is possible given enough time.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 418-430 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Psychology and Aging |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 1 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2019 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review