Debating Intoxication: response to commentaries

Hans Crombag; John Child; George R.  Sullivan

doi:10.1111/add.15257

Debating Intoxication: response to commentaries

Hans Crombag, John Child, George R. Sullivan

Birmingham Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The lack of scientific or clinical clarity faced by courts dealing with cases involving intoxicated criminal defendants is unavoidable, but introducing further legal ambiguity to meet policy goals introduces ever greater risk of problematic (including unjust) legal outcomes.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2210-2212
Number of pages	3
Journal	Addiction
Volume	115
Issue number	12
Early online date	6 Oct 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15257
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

Keywords

Alcohol and drugs
criminal law
mens rea
mental disorders
psychosis
self‐defence

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/add.15257Licence: None: All rights reserved

Cite this

@article{b016655d9e614c5cbbce819fb63cfe62,

title = "Debating Intoxication: response to commentaries",

abstract = "The lack of scientific or clinical clarity faced by courts dealing with cases involving intoxicated criminal defendants is unavoidable, but introducing further legal ambiguity to meet policy goals introduces ever greater risk of problematic (including unjust) legal outcomes. ",

keywords = "Alcohol and drugs, criminal law, mens rea, mental disorders, psychosis, self‐defence",

author = "Hans Crombag and John Child and Sullivan, {George R.}",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1111/add.15257",

language = "English",

volume = "115",

pages = "2210--2212",

journal = "Addiction",

issn = "0965-2140",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Debating Intoxication

T2 - response to commentaries

AU - Crombag, Hans

AU - Child, John

AU - Sullivan, George R.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - The lack of scientific or clinical clarity faced by courts dealing with cases involving intoxicated criminal defendants is unavoidable, but introducing further legal ambiguity to meet policy goals introduces ever greater risk of problematic (including unjust) legal outcomes.

AB - The lack of scientific or clinical clarity faced by courts dealing with cases involving intoxicated criminal defendants is unavoidable, but introducing further legal ambiguity to meet policy goals introduces ever greater risk of problematic (including unjust) legal outcomes.

KW - Alcohol and drugs

KW - criminal law

KW - mens rea

KW - mental disorders

KW - psychosis

KW - self‐defence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092078919&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/add.15257

DO - 10.1111/add.15257

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0965-2140

VL - 115

SP - 2210

EP - 2212

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

IS - 12

ER -

Debating Intoxication: response to commentaries

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this