Dante e Cangrande, Dupin e Salomone

Translated title of the contribution: Dante and Cangrande, Dupin and Solomon

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Today, after the recent and undisputable philological findings, it is
more difficult to question the authorship of the “Epistle to Cangrande”.
Indeed, it could be not too far-fetched to liken the predicament of our
epistle to that of the Purloined Letter in Edgar Allan Poe’s detective story,
and thus come to realise, as Mr. Dupin did, that the authentic letter has
always been there in front of us, in full view. Conceivably, it is too optimistic
to hope the long querelle could be put to rest once and for all. This
contribution, while offering an overview of the critical debate, suggests
that it is high time to move on from the issue of authorship, and come to
terms with the audacious claims of an author who believed his text not
unworthy of conveying an anagogical message. Recalling the authorial
figure of the Biblical Solomon may help us to better understand the bold
project of a Christian poet who dared to use the “allegory of the poets”
for his prophetic “scriptures”, and to see a profound analogy between the
“comedy” of the Canticle of Solomon and the Comedy of Dante.
Translated title of the contributionDante and Cangrande, Dupin and Solomon
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationAtti degli incontri sulle opere di Dante
EditorsM. Gragnolati, LC Rossi, P. Allegretti
PublisherSismel Edizioni del Galluzzo
Pages311-333
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)978-88-8450-856-0
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2018
EventAtti del Workshop Internazionale sull'Epistola a Cangrande - Florence, Italy
Duration: 5 Dec 2013 → …

Conference

ConferenceAtti del Workshop Internazionale sull'Epistola a Cangrande
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityFlorence
Period5/12/13 → …

Keywords

  • cangrande

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dante and Cangrande, Dupin and Solomon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this