TY - BOOK
T1 - D10.6 - Final Version of NanoCommons Sustainability Plan
AU - Serrano, Beatriz Alfaro
AU - Exner, Thomas E.
AU - Afantitis, Antreas
AU - Maier, Dieter
AU - Lynch, Iseult
PY - 2022/6/30
Y1 - 2022/6/30
N2 - NanoCommons was funded as an infrastructure project for a starting community. This means that it was supposed to build the concepts and foundation on which the community can continue to build solutions and services; in the case of NanoCommons, the infrastructure goal was to address the starting community’s data and nanoinformatics needs. NanoCommons did not start entirely from scratch, as it was building on efforts of the Nanosafety Cluster’s Working Group F on data management, and benefited from a general appreciation of the value of data reuse and computational predictions in the community. The push towards increasing use of chemoinformatics and nanoinformatics approaches was also endorsed by the public, regulatory and funding agencies, including being accelerated by the European ban on animal testing in the cosmetics industry and the European Green Deal. Similarly, industry is increasingly acting as a driver: fostering implementation and adoption of data harmonisation, FAIRness (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of data) and openness and recognising that these activities require targeted and centralised efforts, which were provided by NanoCommons. However, a starting community is just that: a start upon which the community can build, a coalescence point around which collective efforts can nucleate. Our journey is still at the earliest stages, and much is needed in terms of automation, tooling, and continued training and education to drive the mindset changes within the community to fully embed data management at the start of the data lifecycle. Sustained and continuous support will be needed to achieve sufficient levels of digitalisation, global adoption of reporting standards both in scientific and regulatory settings, and machine-readability and machine-actionable data, all of which will lead to better quality and reproducible research, and more trust in the data and understanding of its applicability and suitability for reuse thus enhancing the value of the data and knowledge generated. This starts with sustaining what we already have, which in our case is the NanoCommons Knowledge Infrastructure, the implemented services from NanoCommons, as well as other associated partners and projects, and the collaboration with other projects established beyond the borders of nanosafety research. The term sustainability can be described as “the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level”. Applied to NanoCommons, this means...
AB - NanoCommons was funded as an infrastructure project for a starting community. This means that it was supposed to build the concepts and foundation on which the community can continue to build solutions and services; in the case of NanoCommons, the infrastructure goal was to address the starting community’s data and nanoinformatics needs. NanoCommons did not start entirely from scratch, as it was building on efforts of the Nanosafety Cluster’s Working Group F on data management, and benefited from a general appreciation of the value of data reuse and computational predictions in the community. The push towards increasing use of chemoinformatics and nanoinformatics approaches was also endorsed by the public, regulatory and funding agencies, including being accelerated by the European ban on animal testing in the cosmetics industry and the European Green Deal. Similarly, industry is increasingly acting as a driver: fostering implementation and adoption of data harmonisation, FAIRness (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability of data) and openness and recognising that these activities require targeted and centralised efforts, which were provided by NanoCommons. However, a starting community is just that: a start upon which the community can build, a coalescence point around which collective efforts can nucleate. Our journey is still at the earliest stages, and much is needed in terms of automation, tooling, and continued training and education to drive the mindset changes within the community to fully embed data management at the start of the data lifecycle. Sustained and continuous support will be needed to achieve sufficient levels of digitalisation, global adoption of reporting standards both in scientific and regulatory settings, and machine-readability and machine-actionable data, all of which will lead to better quality and reproducible research, and more trust in the data and understanding of its applicability and suitability for reuse thus enhancing the value of the data and knowledge generated. This starts with sustaining what we already have, which in our case is the NanoCommons Knowledge Infrastructure, the implemented services from NanoCommons, as well as other associated partners and projects, and the collaboration with other projects established beyond the borders of nanosafety research. The term sustainability can be described as “the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level”. Applied to NanoCommons, this means...
KW - NanoCommons
KW - Deliverable
KW - Sustainability plan
KW - UN SDGs
U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.8279340
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.8279340
M3 - Other report
BT - D10.6 - Final Version of NanoCommons Sustainability Plan
PB - Zenodo
ER -