Critique of the review of ‘Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries’ published by the Cochrane Collaboration in 2024

  • Damien Walmsley
  • , Ray Lowry
  • , Ahmed Al Rasheed
  • , Colwyn Jones
  • , John Beal
  • , Loc Do
  • , Andrew Rugg-Gunn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Cochrane Review of water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries published in 2024 has been quoted around the world and has particularly impacted decisions in the USA. The objectives, methods and conclusions have changed little from the Cochrane Review of the same subject published in 2015. The 2015 Review was heavily criticised, since evaluations of public health programmes are seldom amenable to methods such as randomised controlled trials. Using such criteria results in the exclusion of much relevant information. There have been recent advances in methods to evaluate longitudinal and cross-sectional observational studies using ‘causal inference’. The aim of this paper is to consider the merits of the 2024 Cochrane Review in light of advances in evaluating public health programmes and the wider evidence base.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Dental Journal
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 16 Jan 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Critique of the review of ‘Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries’ published by the Cochrane Collaboration in 2024'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this