TY - GEN
T1 - Critical infrastructures and sharing: implications for UK centralised infrastructure systems
AU - Leach, Joanne
AU - Bartle, Ian
AU - Hale, James
AU - Bouch, Chris
AU - Boyko, CT
AU - Lee, Susan
AU - de Laurentiis, Valeria
AU - Cavada, Marianna
AU - Locret-Collet, Martin
AU - Hunt, Dexter
AU - Sadler, Jon
AU - Rogers, Chris
PY - 2015/9/14
Y1 - 2015/9/14
N2 - The UK economy has moved away from traditional large-scale and standardised manufacturing processes (Fordism) towards a more service-based economy and smaller-scale and more specialised manufacturing (post-Fordism). A more variegated, smaller-scale and specialised economy seems to fit better with more flexible provision of critical infrastructures. Sharing offers a unique opportunity to modernise UK critical infrastructures, increasing resilience to shocks as well as responsiveness to changes in consumption and production whilst improving sustainability and citizen wellbeing. However, the historic development path taken by UK critical infrastructures has resulted in siloed management structures, substantial sunk-costs, and equipment lock-in, which militates against the emergence of sharing opportunities in these sectors. This paper explores sharing (and in particular issues of ownership and control) as it relates to the critical infrastructures of the UK. It reviews the pathways to the current form and function of UK critical infrastructures in an effort to prevent a resurgence of past problems in tandem with thinking about how these systems might be made more resilient and sustainable through sharing. It concludes that with careful and considered application, sharing offers the potential for new ideas, innovation, greater flexibility and adaptability, a move away from a ‘one size fits all’ approach, and a greater responsiveness that appears lacking in the traditional UK approach to critical infrastructures.
AB - The UK economy has moved away from traditional large-scale and standardised manufacturing processes (Fordism) towards a more service-based economy and smaller-scale and more specialised manufacturing (post-Fordism). A more variegated, smaller-scale and specialised economy seems to fit better with more flexible provision of critical infrastructures. Sharing offers a unique opportunity to modernise UK critical infrastructures, increasing resilience to shocks as well as responsiveness to changes in consumption and production whilst improving sustainability and citizen wellbeing. However, the historic development path taken by UK critical infrastructures has resulted in siloed management structures, substantial sunk-costs, and equipment lock-in, which militates against the emergence of sharing opportunities in these sectors. This paper explores sharing (and in particular issues of ownership and control) as it relates to the critical infrastructures of the UK. It reviews the pathways to the current form and function of UK critical infrastructures in an effort to prevent a resurgence of past problems in tandem with thinking about how these systems might be made more resilient and sustainable through sharing. It concludes that with careful and considered application, sharing offers the potential for new ideas, innovation, greater flexibility and adaptability, a move away from a ‘one size fits all’ approach, and a greater responsiveness that appears lacking in the traditional UK approach to critical infrastructures.
M3 - Conference contribution
BT - International Symposium for Next Generation Infrastructure 2015
ER -