COVID-19 and the case for global development

Johan Oldekop; Rory Horner; David Hulme; Roshan Adhikari; Bina Agarwal; Matthew Alford; Oliver Bakewell; Nicola Banks; Stephanie Barrientos; Tanja Bastia; Anthony Bebbington; Upasak Das; Ralitza Dimova; Richard Duncombe; Charis Enns; David Fielding; Christopher Foster; Timothy Foster; Tomas Frederiksen; GAO PING; Tom Gillespie; Richard Heeks; Sam Hickey; Martin Hess; Nicholas Jepson; Ambarish Karamchedu; Uma Kothari; Aarti Krishnan; Tom Lavers; MAMMAN AMINU; Diana Mitlin; Negar Monazam Tabrizi; Tanja R. Müller; Khalid Nadvi; Giovanni Pasquali; Rose Pritchard; Kate Pruce; Christopher Rees; Jacobus Christiaan Renken; Antonio Savoia; Seth Schindler; Annika Surmeier; Gindo Tampubolon; Matthew Tyce; Vidhya Unnikrishnan; Yin-Fang Zhang

doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

COVID-19 and the case for global development

Johan Oldekop, Rory Horner, David Hulme, Roshan Adhikari, Bina Agarwal, Matthew Alford, Oliver Bakewell, Nicola Banks, Stephanie Barrientos, Tanja Bastia, Anthony Bebbington, Upasak Das, Ralitza Dimova, Richard Duncombe, Charis Enns, David Fielding, Christopher Foster, Timothy Foster, Tomas Frederiksen, GAO PINGTom Gillespie, Richard Heeks, Sam Hickey, Martin Hess, Nicholas Jepson, Ambarish Karamchedu, Uma Kothari, Aarti Krishnan, Tom Lavers, MAMMAN AMINU, Diana Mitlin, Negar Monazam Tabrizi, Tanja R. Müller, Khalid Nadvi, Giovanni Pasquali, Rose Pritchard, Kate Pruce, Christopher Rees, Jacobus Christiaan Renken, Antonio Savoia, Seth Schindler, Annika Surmeier, Gindo Tampubolon, Matthew Tyce, Vidhya Unnikrishnan, Yin-Fang Zhang

International Development

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

COVID-19 accentuates the case for a global, rather than an international, development paradigm. The novel disease is a prime example of a development challenge for all countries, through the failure of public health as a global public good. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the falsity of any assumption that the global North has all the expertise and solutions to tackle global challenges, and has further highlighted the need for multi-directional learning and transformation in all countries towards a more sustainable and equitable world. We illustrate our argument for a global development paradigm by examining the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic across four themes or 'vignettes': global value chains, digitalisation, debt, and climate change. We conclude that development studies must adapt to a very different context from when the field emerged in the mid-20th century.

Original language	English
Journal	World Development
Volume	134
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

Cite this

Oldekop, J., Horner, R., Hulme, D., Adhikari, R., Agarwal, B., Alford, M., Bakewell, O., Banks, N., Barrientos, S., Bastia, T., Bebbington, A., Das, U., Dimova, R., Duncombe, R., Enns, C., Fielding, D., Foster, C., Foster, T., Frederiksen, T., ... Zhang, Y.-F. (2020). COVID-19 and the case for global development. World Development, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

@article{5888224bcec1485cb25a42c7061edb51,

title = "COVID-19 and the case for global development",

abstract = "COVID-19 accentuates the case for a global, rather than an international, development paradigm. The novel disease is a prime example of a development challenge for all countries, through the failure of public health as a global public good. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the falsity of any assumption that the global North has all the expertise and solutions to tackle global challenges, and has further highlighted the need for multi-directional learning and transformation in all countries towards a more sustainable and equitable world. We illustrate our argument for a global development paradigm by examining the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic across four themes or 'vignettes': global value chains, digitalisation, debt, and climate change. We conclude that development studies must adapt to a very different context from when the field emerged in the mid-20th century.",

author = "Johan Oldekop and Rory Horner and David Hulme and Roshan Adhikari and Bina Agarwal and Matthew Alford and Oliver Bakewell and Nicola Banks and Stephanie Barrientos and Tanja Bastia and Anthony Bebbington and Upasak Das and Ralitza Dimova and Richard Duncombe and Charis Enns and David Fielding and Christopher Foster and Timothy Foster and Tomas Frederiksen and GAO PING and Tom Gillespie and Richard Heeks and Sam Hickey and Martin Hess and Nicholas Jepson and Ambarish Karamchedu and Uma Kothari and Aarti Krishnan and Tom Lavers and MAMMAN AMINU and Diana Mitlin and Tabrizi, {Negar Monazam} and M{\"u}ller, {Tanja R.} and Khalid Nadvi and Giovanni Pasquali and Rose Pritchard and Kate Pruce and Christopher Rees and Renken, {Jacobus Christiaan} and Antonio Savoia and Seth Schindler and Annika Surmeier and Gindo Tampubolon and Matthew Tyce and Vidhya Unnikrishnan and Yin-Fang Zhang",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044",

language = "English",

volume = "134",

journal = "World Development",

issn = "0305-750X",

publisher = "Elsevier Sequoia",

}

Oldekop, J, Horner, R, Hulme, D, Adhikari, R, Agarwal, B, Alford, M, Bakewell, O, Banks, N, Barrientos, S, Bastia, T, Bebbington, A, Das, U, Dimova, R, Duncombe, R, Enns, C, Fielding, D, Foster, C, Foster, T, Frederiksen, T, PING, GAO, Gillespie, T, Heeks, R, Hickey, S, Hess, M, Jepson, N, Karamchedu, A, Kothari, U, Krishnan, A, Lavers, T, AMINU, MAMMAN, Mitlin, D, Tabrizi, NM, Müller, TR, Nadvi, K, Pasquali, G, Pritchard, R, Pruce, K, Rees, C, Renken, JC, Savoia, A, Schindler, S, Surmeier, A, Tampubolon, G, Tyce, M, Unnikrishnan, V & Zhang, Y-F 2020, 'COVID-19 and the case for global development', World Development, vol. 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

TY - JOUR

T1 - COVID-19 and the case for global development

AU - Oldekop, Johan

AU - Horner, Rory

AU - Hulme, David

AU - Adhikari, Roshan

AU - Agarwal, Bina

AU - Alford, Matthew

AU - Bakewell, Oliver

AU - Banks, Nicola

AU - Barrientos, Stephanie

AU - Bastia, Tanja

AU - Bebbington, Anthony

AU - Das, Upasak

AU - Dimova, Ralitza

AU - Duncombe, Richard

AU - Enns, Charis

AU - Fielding, David

AU - Foster, Christopher

AU - Foster, Timothy

AU - Frederiksen, Tomas

AU - PING, GAO

AU - Gillespie, Tom

AU - Heeks, Richard

AU - Hickey, Sam

AU - Hess, Martin

AU - Jepson, Nicholas

AU - Karamchedu, Ambarish

AU - Kothari, Uma

AU - Krishnan, Aarti

AU - Lavers, Tom

AU - AMINU, MAMMAN

AU - Mitlin, Diana

AU - Tabrizi, Negar Monazam

AU - Müller, Tanja R.

AU - Nadvi, Khalid

AU - Pasquali, Giovanni

AU - Pritchard, Rose

AU - Pruce, Kate

AU - Rees, Christopher

AU - Renken, Jacobus Christiaan

AU - Savoia, Antonio

AU - Schindler, Seth

AU - Surmeier, Annika

AU - Tampubolon, Gindo

AU - Tyce, Matthew

AU - Unnikrishnan, Vidhya

AU - Zhang, Yin-Fang

PY - 2020/10/1

Y1 - 2020/10/1

N2 - COVID-19 accentuates the case for a global, rather than an international, development paradigm. The novel disease is a prime example of a development challenge for all countries, through the failure of public health as a global public good. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the falsity of any assumption that the global North has all the expertise and solutions to tackle global challenges, and has further highlighted the need for multi-directional learning and transformation in all countries towards a more sustainable and equitable world. We illustrate our argument for a global development paradigm by examining the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic across four themes or 'vignettes': global value chains, digitalisation, debt, and climate change. We conclude that development studies must adapt to a very different context from when the field emerged in the mid-20th century.

AB - COVID-19 accentuates the case for a global, rather than an international, development paradigm. The novel disease is a prime example of a development challenge for all countries, through the failure of public health as a global public good. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the falsity of any assumption that the global North has all the expertise and solutions to tackle global challenges, and has further highlighted the need for multi-directional learning and transformation in all countries towards a more sustainable and equitable world. We illustrate our argument for a global development paradigm by examining the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic across four themes or 'vignettes': global value chains, digitalisation, debt, and climate change. We conclude that development studies must adapt to a very different context from when the field emerged in the mid-20th century.

UR - https://www.researchtest.ppad.man.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/covid19-and-the-case-for-global-development(4127fe0e-707e-4552-99a2-d5602e1a5c50).html

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105044

M3 - Article

SN - 0305-750X

VL - 134

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

ER -

COVID-19 and the case for global development

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this