Corrigendum to “Neural dynamics underlying coherent motion perception in children and adults” [Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 38 (August) (2019) 100670](S1878929318301713)(10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100670)

Catherine Manning*, Blair Kaneshiro, Peter J. Kohler, Mihaela Duta, Gaia Scerif, Anthony M. Norcia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

The authors regret that there was an error in the analysis code for this paper, where we had put the X and Y variables in the wrong order using the MATLAB regression function. The corrected code has been uploaded onto the OSF website: https://osf.io/fkjt6/. This error affects only a small part of the analysis, and all of our conclusions stand. The exact values of the corresponding statistical tests have changed, however, with the effect sizes being much bigger with the corrected analysis code. We still find evidence for significant effects of coherence and group, with steeper slopes in easier conditions than hard conditions, and steeper slopes in adults than young children. The corrected values are presented in the following paragraph: Inspection of Figure 3 also suggested that the slope of increasing positivity became steeper as a function of age. To quantify this, we fit a linear regression to each observer's average component waveform between 260 ms and 460 ms after stimulus onset in each coherence condition and conducted a mixed group by coherence condition ANOVA on the slope coefficients. This revealed a main effect of coherence, F(2.08, 245.17) = 213.18, p <.001, ηp 2 =.64, with shallower slopes in the 10 % coherence condition (M =.01, SE =.005) than in the higher coherence conditions (30 %: M =.07, SE =.007, p <.001; 50 %: M =.16, SE =.009, p <.001; 75 %: M =.22, SE =.01, p <.001). There was also a significant main effect of group, F(3,118) = 9.01, p <.001, ηp 2 =.19, with the youngest, 6- to 7-year-old children having shallower slopes (M =.06, SE =.01) than the adults (M =.15, SE =.016), p <.001, while the slopes of the older children did not differ significantly from those of adults (8- to 10-year-olds: M =.11, SE =.012, p =.10; 10- to 12-year-olds: M =.13, SE =.012, p =.38). The interaction between group and coherence level was also significant, F(6.23, 245.17) = 5.55, p <.001, ηp 2 =.12, with clearer group differences in the higher coherence conditions than in the lowest (10 %) coherence condition. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100748
JournalDevelopmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Neural dynamics underlying coherent motion perception in children and adults” [Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 38 (August) (2019) 100670](S1878929318301713)(10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100670)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this