Corner cutting compromises clinical trials: the inherent problems with up-front randomisation and a common standard arm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To minimise bias, clinical trials must be randomised, and all patients analysed by allocated treatment. With several separate randomisations, patients should be analysed only within the randomisation they entered, and not compared against patients in different randomisations. Some people worry that randomised trials result in many patients receiving an inferior treatment. Accordingly, several suggestions have been made, including a combined control arm for many trials, and performing several randomisations at the same up-front time point. These approaches fundamentally contradict the above statistical principles, and can lead to wrong conclusions. We explore these problems, with reference to one such recent proposal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1073
Number of pages3
JournalLeukemia Research
Volume27
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2003

Keywords

  • Bias (Epidemiology)
  • Data Collection
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corner cutting compromises clinical trials: the inherent problems with up-front randomisation and a common standard arm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this