TY - JOUR
T1 - Contemporary dental practice in the UK: indirect restorations and fixed prosthodontics
AU - Brunton, PA
AU - Christensen, GJ
AU - Cheung, SW
AU - Burke, Frederick
AU - Wilson, NHF
PY - 2005/1/22
Y1 - 2005/1/22
N2 - Objectives: To investigate, by questionnaire, various aspects of primary dental care provision in the North West of England and Scotland.
Method: A questionnaire containing 79 questions was sent to 1,000 practitioners, selected at random, in the North West of England and Scotland. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed.
Results: Overall a response rate of 70% was achieved. The majority of practitioners were practice principals (65%), working in a group NHS practice (80%) located in a city or town centre (49%). On average 10- 20 patients were treated each session with fewer patients treated per session under private arrangements. Many practitioners were found to lack hygienist support (44%) and to employ unqualified dental nurses (82%). Younger practitioners were more likely than senior colleagues to have access to up-to-date computers whilst 37% and 74% of respondents never used CAL programmes or magnification respectively. Contemporary cross-infection control standards were used by the majority of practitioners, although 3% of practitioners reported only autoclaving their handpiece once a day.
Conclusions: The majority of practitioners, involved in this study, worked under National Health Service ( NHS) regulations as principals in a group practice where the workload was greater than the private/independent sector. Contemporary cross-infection procedures were used routinely. In contrast computer-aided learning programmes and magnification were not used routinely. The practitioners in this study employed significant numbers of unqualified dental nurses.
AB - Objectives: To investigate, by questionnaire, various aspects of primary dental care provision in the North West of England and Scotland.
Method: A questionnaire containing 79 questions was sent to 1,000 practitioners, selected at random, in the North West of England and Scotland. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed.
Results: Overall a response rate of 70% was achieved. The majority of practitioners were practice principals (65%), working in a group NHS practice (80%) located in a city or town centre (49%). On average 10- 20 patients were treated each session with fewer patients treated per session under private arrangements. Many practitioners were found to lack hygienist support (44%) and to employ unqualified dental nurses (82%). Younger practitioners were more likely than senior colleagues to have access to up-to-date computers whilst 37% and 74% of respondents never used CAL programmes or magnification respectively. Contemporary cross-infection control standards were used by the majority of practitioners, although 3% of practitioners reported only autoclaving their handpiece once a day.
Conclusions: The majority of practitioners, involved in this study, worked under National Health Service ( NHS) regulations as principals in a group practice where the workload was greater than the private/independent sector. Contemporary cross-infection procedures were used routinely. In contrast computer-aided learning programmes and magnification were not used routinely. The practitioners in this study employed significant numbers of unqualified dental nurses.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144267375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811980
DO - 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811980
M3 - Article
C2 - 15716892
SN - 1476-5373
VL - 198
SP - 99
EP - 103
JO - British Dental Journal
JF - British Dental Journal
IS - 2
ER -