Abstract
The concept of constitutional identity has been criticized for being too
indeterminate and prone to abuse by authoritarian governments. It has been suggested that constitutional identity should be eliminated from European constitutional discourse. This article argues against the banishment of constitutional identity. First, it shows that the critiques of constitutional identity fail to engage with the concept properly and do not offer a credible alternative. Second, the article advances an account of the concept and normative value of constitutional identity. Third, the article argues that such an account of constitutional identity allows us to recognize instances of its abuse.
indeterminate and prone to abuse by authoritarian governments. It has been suggested that constitutional identity should be eliminated from European constitutional discourse. This article argues against the banishment of constitutional identity. First, it shows that the critiques of constitutional identity fail to engage with the concept properly and do not offer a credible alternative. Second, the article advances an account of the concept and normative value of constitutional identity. Third, the article argues that such an account of constitutional identity allows us to recognize instances of its abuse.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 359-384 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Union University Law Review |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 29 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- constitutional identity
- constitutional pluralism
- EU law
- constitutional adjudication
- constitutional interpretation
- populism