Connections between two models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

RM Harbord, Jonathan Deeks, L Bachmann, M Eggar, P Whiting, JAC Sterne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    457 Citations (Scopus)


    Studies of diagnostic accuracy require more sophisticated methods for their meta-analysis than studies of therapeutic interventions. A number of different, and apparently divergent, methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies have been proposed, including two alternative approaches that are statistically rigorous and allow for between-study variability: the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model (Rutter and Gatsonis, 2001) and bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (van Houwelingen and others, 1993), (van Houwelingen and others, 2002), (Reitsma and others, 2005). We show that these two models are very closely related, and define the circumstances in which they are identical. We discuss the different forms of summary model output suggested by the two approaches, including summary ROC curves, summary points, confidence regions, and prediction regions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-51
    Number of pages13
    Issue number2
    Early online date11 May 2006
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2007


    Dive into the research topics of 'Connections between two models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this