Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

Brian Gaines; Mark Goodwin; Stephen Bates; Gisela Sin

doi:10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

Brian Gaines, Mark Goodwin, Stephen Bates, Gisela Sin

Political Science and International Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

186 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	434-441
Number of pages	8
Journal	The Journal of Legislative Studies
Volume	25
Issue number	3
Early online date	9 Sept 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 9 Sept 2019

Keywords

committees
rational choice
gender
legislatures

Access to Document

10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613Licence: None: All rights reserved

Bates_et_al_Conclusion:_prospects_for_analysing_committees_in_comparative_perspective_The_Journal_of_Legislative_Studies_2019
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Legislative Studies on 09/09/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662614
Accepted author manuscript, 158 KBLicence: None: All rights reserved

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613Licence: None: All rights reserved

Cite this

@article{5a4f867abc9f4e0c9b36ed1159992ee7,

title = "Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective",

abstract = "While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.",

keywords = "committees, rational choice, gender, legislatures",

author = "Brian Gaines and Mark Goodwin and Stephen Bates and Gisela Sin",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "9",

doi = "10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "434--441",

journal = "The Journal of Legislative Studies",

issn = "1357-2334",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conclusion

T2 - prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

AU - Gaines, Brian

AU - Goodwin, Mark

AU - Bates, Stephen

AU - Sin, Gisela

PY - 2019/9/9

Y1 - 2019/9/9

N2 - While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

AB - While theories of committees in the U.S. Congress can continue to play a central role in the still-growing comparative study of committees, they require careful, frequent modification. Moreover, more fruitful study of committees may require a wider framework, recognising more fully that committees are institutions embedded in wider social structures.

KW - committees

KW - rational choice

KW - gender

KW - legislatures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072019705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

DO - 10.1080/13572334.2019.1662613

M3 - Article

SN - 1357-2334

VL - 25

SP - 434

EP - 441

JO - The Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - The Journal of Legislative Studies

IS - 3

ER -

Conclusion: prospects for analysing committees in comparative perspective

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this