Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature

Sam Eldabe, Eric Buchser, Rui Duarte

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    95 Citations (Scopus)
    277 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Objective: Spinal cord and peripheral neurostimulation techniques have been practiced since 1967 for the relief of pain and some techniques are also used for improvement in organ function. Neuromodulation has recognised complications, although very rarely do these cause long term morbidity. The aim of this article is to present a review of complications observed in patients treated with neurostimulation techniques.
    Methods: A review of the major recent publications in the literature on the subjects of spinal cord, occipital, sacral and peripheral nerve field stimulation was conducted.
    Results: The incidence of complications reported varies from 30% to 40% of patients affected by one or more complications. Adverse events can be subdivided into hardware related complications and biological complications. The commonest hardware related complication is lead migration. Other lead related complications such as failure or fracture have also been reported. Common biological complications include infection and pain over the implant. Serious biological complications such as dural puncture headache and neurological damage are rarely observed.
    Conclusions: Spinal cord and peripheral neurostimulation techniques are safe and reversible therapies. Hardware related complications are more commonly observed than biological complications. Serious adverse events such as neurological damage are rare.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)325–336
    JournalPain Medicine
    Volume17
    Issue number2
    Early online date14 Dec 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this