Comparison of GUIs and CUIs: appropriate ranges of actions and ease of use

C. Baber; T. Hoyes; N. A. Stanton

doi:10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R

Comparison of GUIs and CUIs: appropriate ranges of actions and ease of use

C. Baber^*
, T. Hoyes
, N. A. Stanton

^*Corresponding author for this work

Mechanical Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While packages using graphical user interfaces appear to have gained a sizeable share of the computer software market, there is surprisingly little research into whether they are superior to more traditional, character-based interface designs; research conducted so far often provides conflicting evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the qualitative and quantitative differences between graphical and character-based user interfaces, using a range of methods and software packages.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	207-215
Number of pages	9
Journal	Displays
Volume	14
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R
Publication status	Published - Oct 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Human-Computer Interaction
Hardware and Architecture
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R

Cite this

@article{1a24e3617bb142c5b9677b4b9bfda225,

title = "Comparison of GUIs and CUIs: appropriate ranges of actions and ease of use",

abstract = "While packages using graphical user interfaces appear to have gained a sizeable share of the computer software market, there is surprisingly little research into whether they are superior to more traditional, character-based interface designs; research conducted so far often provides conflicting evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the qualitative and quantitative differences between graphical and character-based user interfaces, using a range of methods and software packages.",

author = "C. Baber and T. Hoyes and Stanton, \{N. A.\}",

year = "1993",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "207--215",

journal = "Displays",

issn = "0141-9382",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of GUIs and CUIs

T2 - appropriate ranges of actions and ease of use

AU - Baber, C.

AU - Hoyes, T.

AU - Stanton, N. A.

PY - 1993/10

Y1 - 1993/10

N2 - While packages using graphical user interfaces appear to have gained a sizeable share of the computer software market, there is surprisingly little research into whether they are superior to more traditional, character-based interface designs; research conducted so far often provides conflicting evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the qualitative and quantitative differences between graphical and character-based user interfaces, using a range of methods and software packages.

AB - While packages using graphical user interfaces appear to have gained a sizeable share of the computer software market, there is surprisingly little research into whether they are superior to more traditional, character-based interface designs; research conducted so far often provides conflicting evidence. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the qualitative and quantitative differences between graphical and character-based user interfaces, using a range of methods and software packages.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/38249000867

U2 - 10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R

DO - 10.1016/0141-9382(93)90090-R

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:38249000867

SN - 0141-9382

VL - 14

SP - 207

EP - 215

JO - Displays

JF - Displays

IS - 4

ER -

Comparison of GUIs and CUIs: appropriate ranges of actions and ease of use

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this