Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs

Nigel Stallard, Susan Todd, Elizabeth G Ryan, Simon Gates

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in the use of Bayesian adaptive designs in late-phase clinical trials. This includes the use of stopping rules based on Bayesian analyses in which the frequentist type I error rate is controlled as in frequentist group-sequential designs.

METHODS: This paper presents a practical comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential tests. Focussing on the setting in which data can be summarised by normally distributed test statistics, we evaluate and compare boundary values and operating characteristics.

RESULTS: Although Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential approaches are based on fundamentally different paradigms, in a single arm trial or two-arm comparative trial with a prior distribution specified for the treatment difference, Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential tests can have identical stopping rules if particular critical values with which the posterior probability is compared or particular spending function values are chosen. If the Bayesian critical values at different looks are restricted to be equal, O'Brien and Fleming's design corresponds to a Bayesian design with an exceptionally informative negative prior, Pocock's design to a Bayesian design with a non-informative prior and frequentist designs with a linear alpha spending function are very similar to Bayesian designs with slightly informative priors.This contrasts with the setting of a comparative trial with independent prior distributions specified for treatment effects in different groups. In this case Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential tests cannot have the same stopping rule as the Bayesian stopping rule depends on the observed means in the two groups and not just on their difference. In this setting the Bayesian test can only be guaranteed to control the type I error for a specified range of values of the control group treatment effect.

CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of frequentist and Bayesian designs can encourage careful thought about design parameters and help to ensure appropriate design choices are made.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)4
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2020


  • Adaptive design
  • Interim analysis
  • Sequential analysis
  • Sequential design
  • Type I error rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Health Informatics


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this