Abstract
The quantification of microplastics in environmental samples often requires an observer to determine whether a particle is plastic or non-plastic, prior to further verification procedures. This implies that inconspicuous microplastics with a low natural detection may be underestimated. The present study aimed at assessing this underestimation, looking at how colour (white, green and blue), size (large; ~1000 μm and small; <400 μm) and grain size fraction may affect detection. Sediment treatments varying in grain size were inoculated with known quantities of low-density polyethylene microbeads extracted from commercially bought facial scrubs. These microbeads varied in colour and size. Once extracted using a density separation method microbeads were counted. An overall underestimation of 78.59% may be a result of observer error and/or technical error. More specifically, the results suggested that microbeads varying in colour and size have a different detection probability and that these microbead features are more important in underestimation likelihoods than grain sizes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 567-570 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
| Volume | 655 |
| Early online date | 19 Nov 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Mar 2019 |
Keywords
- Analytical methods
- Detection probability
- Microplastics
- Observer error
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Pollution
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Colour and size influences plastic microbead underestimation, regardless of sediment grain size'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver