Characterizing Manufactured Nanoparticles in the Environment: Multimethod Determination of Particle Sizes

RF Domingos; Mohamed Baalousha; Y Ju-Nam; MM Reid; N Tufenkji; Jamie Lead; GG Leppard; KJ Wilkinson

doi:10.1021/es900249m

Characterizing Manufactured Nanoparticles in the Environment: Multimethod Determination of Particle Sizes

RF Domingos, Mohamed Baalousha, Y Ju-Nam, MM Reid, N Tufenkji, Jamie Lead, GG Leppard, KJ Wilkinson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

432 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sizes of stabilized (24 h) nanoparticle suspensions were determined using several state-of-the-art analytical techniques (transmission electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; dynamic light scattering; fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; nanoparticle tracking analysis; flow field flow fractionation). Theoretical and analytical considerations were evaluated, results were compared, and the advantages and limitations of the techniques were discussed. No "ideal" technique was found for characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in an environmental context as each technique had its own advantages and limitations,

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	7277-7284
Number of pages	8
Journal	Environmental Science & Technology
Volume	43
Issue number	19
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1021/es900249m
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2009

Access to Document

10.1021/es900249m

Understanding the environmental behaviour and biological impacts of manufactured nanoparticles in natural aquatic systems
Lead, J., Kendall, K. & Preece, J.
Natural Environment Research Council
1/04/06 → 30/11/10
Project: Research Councils

Cite this

@article{a789bc13e6a6483986c4462405c88afe,

title = "Characterizing Manufactured Nanoparticles in the Environment: Multimethod Determination of Particle Sizes",

abstract = "Sizes of stabilized (24 h) nanoparticle suspensions were determined using several state-of-the-art analytical techniques (transmission electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; dynamic light scattering; fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; nanoparticle tracking analysis; flow field flow fractionation). Theoretical and analytical considerations were evaluated, results were compared, and the advantages and limitations of the techniques were discussed. No {"}ideal{"} technique was found for characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in an environmental context as each technique had its own advantages and limitations,",

author = "RF Domingos and Mohamed Baalousha and Y Ju-Nam and MM Reid and N Tufenkji and Jamie Lead and GG Leppard and KJ Wilkinson",

year = "2009",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1021/es900249m",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "7277--7284",

journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",

issn = "1520-5851",

publisher = "American Chemical Society",

number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterizing Manufactured Nanoparticles in the Environment: Multimethod Determination of Particle Sizes

AU - Domingos, RF

AU - Baalousha, Mohamed

AU - Ju-Nam, Y

AU - Reid, MM

AU - Tufenkji, N

AU - Lead, Jamie

AU - Leppard, GG

AU - Wilkinson, KJ

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Sizes of stabilized (24 h) nanoparticle suspensions were determined using several state-of-the-art analytical techniques (transmission electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; dynamic light scattering; fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; nanoparticle tracking analysis; flow field flow fractionation). Theoretical and analytical considerations were evaluated, results were compared, and the advantages and limitations of the techniques were discussed. No "ideal" technique was found for characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in an environmental context as each technique had its own advantages and limitations,

AB - Sizes of stabilized (24 h) nanoparticle suspensions were determined using several state-of-the-art analytical techniques (transmission electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; dynamic light scattering; fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; nanoparticle tracking analysis; flow field flow fractionation). Theoretical and analytical considerations were evaluated, results were compared, and the advantages and limitations of the techniques were discussed. No "ideal" technique was found for characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in an environmental context as each technique had its own advantages and limitations,

U2 - 10.1021/es900249m

DO - 10.1021/es900249m

M3 - Article

C2 - 19848134

SN - 1520-5851

VL - 43

SP - 7277

EP - 7284

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

IS - 19

ER -

Characterizing Manufactured Nanoparticles in the Environment: Multimethod Determination of Particle Sizes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Projects

Understanding the environmental behaviour and biological impacts of manufactured nanoparticles in natural aquatic systems

Cite this