Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Catherine Malabou: plasticity, political ontology, biopower and education

  • Nick Peim

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

Abstract

Malabou’s writings offer an original take on the ontological turn (Heidegger, Derrida). Following and challenging Derrida, she has adopted and transformed Hegel’s ‘plasticity’ as an ontological principle. For Malabou ‘plasticity’ is alternative to ‘writing’ as (dis)articulated by Derrida as the principle of difference that is constitutive of being. Here difference is to be understood as defining an ontology that refuses to equate being with presence. Malabou’s original projection of the idea of plasticity is later developed to re-address questions concerning subjectivity through an encounter with contemporary neuroscience. As a contribution to fundamental ontology this has implications that are further developed in (2011) Ontology of the Accident. Further, in recent work, Malabou has addressed the question of the possibility of deconstructing biopolitics. The last section of this introduction explores her rethinking of the meaning of ‘life’ drawing on epigenetics that she proposes offers a way of deconstructing biopolitics and that I propose suggests ontologically alternative ways of understanding education in our time.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhilosophy as Interplay and Dialogue
Subtitle of host publicationViewing landscapes within philosophy of education
EditorsTorill Strand, Richard Smith, Anne Pirrie, Zelia Gregoriou, Marianna Papastephanou
PublisherLIT Verlag
Chapter16
Pages451-484
Number of pages34
ISBN (Print)9783643909565
Publication statusPublished - 11 Dec 2017

Publication series

NameStudies on Education
PublisherLIT Verlag
Volume5

Keywords

  • plasticity
  • deconstruction
  • biopower
  • education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catherine Malabou: plasticity, political ontology, biopower and education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this