Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Catching up with 'Europe'? Constitutional Debates on the Territorial- Administrative Model in Independent Ukraine

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

Ukraine is a country with pronounced regional differences and a longstanding indigenous tradition of thinking on decentralization and federalism. Yet upon emerging as an independentp olity, Ukraine failed to reform the territorial division inherited from the Soviet Union and opted for a centralized territorial-administrative system and territorial autonomy for the Crimean peninsula. The path of post-Soviet reforms can largely be attributed to a profound disagreement on what constituted the indigenous tradition and fear of centrifugal tendencies, which manifestedt hemselves after independence.I n the context of historical legacies of statel essness, the preservation of national unity and territorial cohesion was deemed of paramount importance. This would consolidate Ukraine's transformation into a truly European nation-state.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRegion, State and Identity in Central and Eastern Europe
EditorsJudy Batt, Kataryna Wolczuk
PublisherRoutledge
Pages65-88
Number of pages24
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9780203045770
ISBN (Print)9780714652436, 9780714682259
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jul 2002

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Federalism and Decentralization
PublisherRoutledge

Bibliographical note

This study first appeared in a Special Issue of Regional and Federal Studies (ISSN 1359-7566), Vol. 12, No.2 (Summer 2002), published by Frank Cass and Co. Ltd.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2002 Frank Cass & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Catching up with 'Europe'? Constitutional Debates on the Territorial- Administrative Model in Independent Ukraine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this