Care staff attributions toward self-injurious behaviour exhibited by adults with intellectual disabilities

Elizabeth Snow, Peter Langdon*, Shirley Reynolds

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Challenging behaviours may elicit negative emotional reactions and increase stress within care staff. The Leeds Attributional Coding System (LACS) was used to elicit spontaneous causal attributions of staff toward hypothetical clients with challenging behaviours. It was hypothesized that there would be relationships (1) between staff exposure to challenging behaviours and burnout, and (2) between staff cognitions and burnout. Using a cross-sectional correlational design, 41 care staff took part in a 10 minute interview about two vignettes depicting self-injurious behaviour. Staff also completed measures of demographic information and burnout. Participants made attributions toward self-injurious behaviour that were typically internal to the client, uncontrollable, unstable and specific.There was a significant association between number of clients cared for and emotional exhaustion and personal accomplishment. Staff who made fewer stable attributions had higher levels of burnout. There were no other relationships found between staff cognition and burnout. The LACS can be successfully employed in this context, and may have some benefits over other methods. Future research is required to explore the relationship between cognition and burnout.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-63
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Intellectual Disabilities
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attribution theory
  • Intellectual disability
  • Leeds Attributional Coding System
  • Self-harm
  • Staff burnout

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Care staff attributions toward self-injurious behaviour exhibited by adults with intellectual disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this