Abstract
We prove that every graph has a canonical tree of tree-decompositions that distinguishes all principal tangles (these include the ends and various kinds of large finite dense structures) efficiently.
Here ‘trees of tree-decompositions’ are a slightly weaker notion than ‘tree-decompositions’ but much more well-behaved than ‘tree-like metric spaces’. This theorem is best possible in the sense that we give an example that ‘trees of tree-decompositions’ cannot be strengthened to ‘tree-decompositions’ in the above theorem.
This implies results of Dunwoody and Krön as well as of Carmesin, Diestel, Hundertmark and Stein. Beyond that for locally finite graphs our result gives for each k ε ℕ canonical tree-decompositions that distinguish all k-distinguishable ends efficiently.
Here ‘trees of tree-decompositions’ are a slightly weaker notion than ‘tree-decompositions’ but much more well-behaved than ‘tree-like metric spaces’. This theorem is best possible in the sense that we give an example that ‘trees of tree-decompositions’ cannot be strengthened to ‘tree-decompositions’ in the above theorem.
This implies results of Dunwoody and Krön as well as of Carmesin, Diestel, Hundertmark and Stein. Beyond that for locally finite graphs our result gives for each k ε ℕ canonical tree-decompositions that distinguish all k-distinguishable ends efficiently.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-26 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of Combinatorial Theory. Series B |
| Volume | 152 |
| Early online date | 14 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2022 |
Keywords
- Canonical tree of tree-decomposition
- End
- Graph
- Profile
- Tangle
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Canonical trees of tree-decompositions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver