Calibrating Introspection

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
339 Downloads (Pure)


The epistemic credentials of introspection are often overestimated by philosophers and psychologists in their theorizing. This point has been argued in recent literature; yet a sceptical position on introspection which recommends its wholesale rejection as a source of knowledge is not credible. We can and do know things about our own minds by introspection. A sensible view on introspection is therefore moderate in its scepticism. It is surprisingly hard, however, to make a principled case for such a position. In this paper, I put forward and defend a moderate scepticism about introspection. I show how this position yields the resources to pin down the scope and content of introspective knowledge. A major attraction of the view is that it provides a strategy for solving a problem which has vexed the scientific study of consciousness from its inception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-321
Number of pages22
JournalPhilosophical Issues
Issue number1
Early online date12 Oct 2015
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015


  • Introspection


Dive into the research topics of 'Calibrating Introspection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this