Brutalist fundamentalism: radical and moderate

Joaquim Giannotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In contemporary metaphysics, the doctrine that the fundamental facts are those which are wholly ungrounded is the received view or something near enough. Against this radical brutalism, several metaphysicians argued in favour of the existence of fundamental facts that are moderately brute or merely partially grounded. However, the arguments for moderately brute facts rely on controversial metaphysical scenarios. This paper aims to counteract the tendency in favour of radical brutalism on scientific grounds. It does so by showing that naturalistic metaphysicians can appeal to plausible considerations from physical theory to establish the existence of moderately brute facts. But should the naturalistic metaphysician embrace moderate brutalism, namely the view that the fundamental facts are those which are merely partially ungrounded? Here I argue for a negative answer, recommending a more inclusive pluralism about the kinds of brute facts we can expect to find in nature.
Original languageEnglish
Article number232
JournalSynthese
Volume200
Issue number3
Early online date20 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Brute facts
  • Fundamental facts
  • Fundamentalism
  • Grounding
  • Naturalistic metaphysics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brutalist fundamentalism: radical and moderate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this