TY - JOUR
T1 - Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery: the use of Aprotinin does not affect survival
AU - Pagano, Domenico
AU - Howell, Neil
AU - Freemantle, Nick
AU - Cunningham, D
AU - Bonser, Robert
AU - Graham, Timothy
AU - Mascaro, J
AU - Rooney, SJ
PY - 2008/3/1
Y1 - 2008/3/1
N2 - Objective: The antifibrinolytic drug aprotinin has been the most widely used agent to reduce bleeding and its complications in cardiac surgery. Several randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated it to be effective and safe. However, 2 recent reports from a single database have implicated the use of aprotinin as a risk for postoperative complications and reduced long-term survival. Methods: In this single-institution observational study involving 7836 consecutive patients (1998-2006), we assessed the safety of using aprotinin in risk reduction strategy for postoperative bleeding. Results: Aprotinin was used in 44% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified aprotinin use in risk reduction for reoperation for bleeding ( odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.72; P = .001) and need for blood transfusion postoperatively ( odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.79; P = .0002). The use of aprotinin did not affect in-hospital mortality ( odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.49; P= 0.73), intermediate-term survival ( median follow-up, 3.4 years; range, 0-8.9 years; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.28; P = .30), incidence of postoperative hemodialysis ( odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.85; P = .49), and incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction ( odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.03; P = .07). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that aprotinin is effective in reducing bleeding after cardiac surgery, is safe, and does not affect short- or medium-term survival.
AB - Objective: The antifibrinolytic drug aprotinin has been the most widely used agent to reduce bleeding and its complications in cardiac surgery. Several randomized trials and meta-analyses have demonstrated it to be effective and safe. However, 2 recent reports from a single database have implicated the use of aprotinin as a risk for postoperative complications and reduced long-term survival. Methods: In this single-institution observational study involving 7836 consecutive patients (1998-2006), we assessed the safety of using aprotinin in risk reduction strategy for postoperative bleeding. Results: Aprotinin was used in 44% of patients. Multivariate analysis identified aprotinin use in risk reduction for reoperation for bleeding ( odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.72; P = .001) and need for blood transfusion postoperatively ( odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.79; P = .0002). The use of aprotinin did not affect in-hospital mortality ( odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.49; P= 0.73), intermediate-term survival ( median follow-up, 3.4 years; range, 0-8.9 years; hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.28; P = .30), incidence of postoperative hemodialysis ( odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.85; P = .49), and incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction ( odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-1.03; P = .07). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that aprotinin is effective in reducing bleeding after cardiac surgery, is safe, and does not affect short- or medium-term survival.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.045
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.11.045
M3 - Article
C2 - 18329459
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 135
SP - 495
EP - 502
JO - The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -