Abstract
This article assesses the government's claim that the White Paper, Strong Local Leadership - Quality Public Services (2001), reverses the centralising trend of the previous 20 years. It is argued that the 'confessions and concessions' of the White Paper do not actually represent a reduction of centralism or any enhancement of local government autonomy. Where controls are relaxed, these are primarily managerial rather than political; delivery rather than democracy is the primary focus of attention. Increasingly sophisticated approaches to performance management signal both a new form of centralism and a challenge to the traditional bilateral model of central-local relations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-147 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Local Government Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2002 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
- Sociology and Political Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Between rhetoric and reality: Does the 2001 white paper reverse the centralising trend in Britain?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver