TY - JOUR
T1 - Best–worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it
AU - Flynn, T
AU - Louviere, J
AU - Peters, T
AU - Coast, Joanna
PY - 2007/1/1
Y1 - 2007/1/1
N2 - Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.
AB - Statements like "quality of care is more highly valued than waiting time" can neither be supported nor refuted by comparisons of utility parameters from a traditional discrete choice experiment (DCE). Best--worst scaling can overcome this problem because it asks respondents to perform a different choice task. However, whilst the nature of the best--worst task is generally understood, there are a number of issues relating to the design and analysis of a best--worst choice experiment that require further exposition. This paper illustrates how to aggregate and analyse such data and using a quality of life pilot study demonstrates how richer insights can be drawn by the use of best--worst tasks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845456096&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 16707175
SN - 0167-6296
VL - 26
SP - 171
EP - 189
JO - Journal of Health Economics
JF - Journal of Health Economics
IS - 1
ER -