Benchmarking mobilization practice and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a three-year service evaluation

  • Fiona Howroyd*
  • , James Hodson
  • , Anne Preece
  • , Tammy Lea
  • , Samantha Rooney
  • , Hon Sing Geoffrey Wu
  • , Simran Rahania
  • , Fang Gao Smith
  • , Tonny Veenith
  • , Niharika Duggal*
  • , Zubair Ahmed*
  • , Jonathan Weblin*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Mobilization is defined as the application of assisted movement and physical therapy to hospitalized patients, including progressive exercise and ambulation programs. While early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been shown to be a safe and effective intervention to improve patient outcomes in the general ICU cohort, there is currently limited evidence specific to patients with acute TBI. The aim of this service evaluation was to identify current mobilization activity and functional outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU at our institution following an acute TBI.

Methods: A single-center retrospective service evaluation was performed for all patients, over 16 years-old, admitted to the ICU at our institution (a Level 1 major trauma center) with an acute TBI between January 2022 and November 2024. Patient demographics, ICU admission details, TBI severity (based on the Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS]) and functional outcomes were extracted. Mobilization outcomes included the timing of the commencement of mobilization (defined as sitting on the edge of the bed or better) and mobilization status, defined using the Manchester Mobility Scale (MMS).

Results: The service evaluation included 353 patients, of whom 56.0% had severe TBI (GCS: 3–7). Mobilization was achieved in ICU for 53.0% of patients, with a further 18.1% first mobilized on a hospital ward post-ICU discharge. The first mobilization occurred at a median of 11 days (interquartile range: 6–18) after ICU admission. In patients surviving to ICU discharge, 28.9% had an MMS of 1 (bed-based exercises) at this time, with only 9.1% achieving an MMS of 7 (mobilizing 30 meters or more). Analysis by TBI severity found a significant decline in in-hospital mobilization rates with increasing TBI severity (90.7% vs. 58.4% for mild vs. severe TBI; p < 0.001), with a corresponding increase in the time to the first mobilization (median: 6 vs. 13 days for mild vs. severe TBI; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Acute TBI patients admitted to the ICU at our institution had low rates of mobilization and achieved low levels of mobility at ICU discharge. This service evaluation highlights the need for prospective studies into early mobilization practices in the neurotrauma ICU.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1694393
Number of pages17
JournalFrontiers in neurology
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Jan 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright: © 2026 Howroyd, Hodson, Preece, Lea, Rooney, Wu, Rahania, Smith, Veenith, Duggal, Ahmed and Weblin.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Benchmarking mobilization practice and functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a three-year service evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this