Bank opacity and risk-taking: Evidence from analysts' forecasts

Samuel Fosu, Collins G. Ntim, William Coffie, Victor Murinde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
156 Downloads (Pure)


We depart from existing literature by invoking analysts' forecasts to measure banking system opacity and then investigate the impact of such opacity on bank risk-taking, using a large panel of US bank holding companies, over the 1995--2013 period. We uncover three new results. Firstly, we find that opacity increases insolvency risks among banks. Secondly, we establish that the relationship between opacity and bank risk-taking is accentuated by the degree of banking market competition. Thirdly, we show that the bank business model moderates the risk-taking incentives of opaque banks, albeit only marginally. Overall, these findings suggest that the analysts’ forecast measure of bank opacity is useful for understanding risk-taking by publicly-traded banks, with important implications for bank stability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-95
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Early online date1 Nov 2017
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017


  • Bank opacity
  • Analysts’ forecasts
  • bank stability
  • banking market competition
  • bank business models


Dive into the research topics of 'Bank opacity and risk-taking: Evidence from analysts' forecasts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this