Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bad parents? evaluating judgements of infant homicides

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While the killing of one’s own infant is an undoubtedly harrowing crime, there exists little research exploring attitudes toward these individuals. Such work has focused primarily on depictions of mothers, yet U.K. government data indicate that the majority of infant homicide cases involve paternal suspects. A sample of U.K. residents (n = 245) participated in a mixed-methods design to explore attitudes toward mothers and fathers who have been accused of murdering their infant child and whether parental mental health issues impacted these judgements. Results aligned with the chivalry hypothesis wherein maternal suspects were evaluated more leniently. Qualitative analyses uncovered hidden gender expectations: mothers were ascribed blame when the father was accused of infant homicide, a finding that was not present in the reverse scenario. This suggests that traditional views of motherhood conflict with a shifting social landscape that is seeing an increase in stay-at-home fathers and working mothers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)725-747
Number of pages23
JournalPsychiatry Psychology and Law
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • homicide
  • infant homicide
  • infanticide
  • judgements
  • manslaughter
  • mental health
  • well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bad parents? evaluating judgements of infant homicides'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this