Attention psychology and pluralism

John Taylor

doi:10.1093/bjps/axx030

Attention psychology and pluralism

John Taylor

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

250 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is an overriding orthodoxy amongst philosophers that attention is a ‘unified phenomenon’, subject to explanation by one monistic theory. In this paper, I examine whether this philosophical orthodoxy is reflected in the practice of psychology. I argue that the view of attention that best represents psychological work is a variety of conceptual pluralism. When it comes to the psychology of attention, monism should be rejected and pluralism should be embraced.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	935–956
Number of pages	32
Journal	The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Volume	69
Issue number	4
Early online date	22 Aug 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx030
Publication status	Published - Dec 2018

Access to Document

10.1093/bjps/axx030Licence: None: All rights reserved

Henry_Taylor_Attention,_psychology,_and_pluralism_British_Journal_for_the_Philosophy_of_Science_2017
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science following peer review. The version of record Henry Taylor, Attention, Psychology, and Pluralism, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Volume 69, Issue 4, December 2018, Pages 935–956 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx030.
Accepted author manuscript, 314 KBLicence: Other (please specify with Rights Statement)

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx030Licence: None: All rights reserved

Cite this

@article{a89fa3ef2bdf4855a9661ddde53aa839,

title = "Attention psychology and pluralism",

abstract = "There is an overriding orthodoxy amongst philosophers that attention is a {\textquoteleft}unified phenomenon{\textquoteright}, subject to explanation by one monistic theory. In this paper, I examine whether this philosophical orthodoxy is reflected in the practice of psychology. I argue that the view of attention that best represents psychological work is a variety of conceptual pluralism. When it comes to the psychology of attention, monism should be rejected and pluralism should be embraced.",

author = "John Taylor",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1093/bjps/axx030",

language = "English",

volume = "69",

pages = "935–956",

journal = "The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",

issn = "0007-0882",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attention psychology and pluralism

AU - Taylor, John

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - There is an overriding orthodoxy amongst philosophers that attention is a ‘unified phenomenon’, subject to explanation by one monistic theory. In this paper, I examine whether this philosophical orthodoxy is reflected in the practice of psychology. I argue that the view of attention that best represents psychological work is a variety of conceptual pluralism. When it comes to the psychology of attention, monism should be rejected and pluralism should be embraced.

AB - There is an overriding orthodoxy amongst philosophers that attention is a ‘unified phenomenon’, subject to explanation by one monistic theory. In this paper, I examine whether this philosophical orthodoxy is reflected in the practice of psychology. I argue that the view of attention that best represents psychological work is a variety of conceptual pluralism. When it comes to the psychology of attention, monism should be rejected and pluralism should be embraced.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85184388492

U2 - 10.1093/bjps/axx030

DO - 10.1093/bjps/axx030

M3 - Article

SN - 0007-0882

VL - 69

SP - 935

EP - 956

JO - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

IS - 4

ER -

Attention psychology and pluralism

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this