TY - JOUR
T1 - Asteroseismology of 3,642 Kepler Red Giants
T2 - correcting the scaling relations based on detailed modeling
AU - Li, Tanda
AU - Li, Yaguang
AU - Bi, Shaolan
AU - Bedding, Timothy R.
AU - Davies, Guy
AU - Du, Minghao
PY - 2022/3/14
Y1 - 2022/3/14
N2 - This paper presents a correction to the scaling relations for red giant stars using model-based masses and radii. We measure radial-mode frequencies from Kepler observations for 3642 solar-like oscillators on the red giant branch and use them to characterize the stars with grid-based modeling. We determine fundamental stellar parameters with good precision: the typical uncertainty is 4.5% for mass, 16% for age, 0.006 dex for surface gravity, and 1.7% for radius. We also achieve good accuracy for estimated masses and radii, based on a comparison with those determined for eclipsing binaries. We find a systematic offset of ∼15% in mass and ∼7% in radius between the modeling solutions and the scaling relations. Further investigation indicates that these offsets are mainly caused by a systematic bias in the Δν scaling relation: the original scaling relation underestimates the Δν value by ∼4%, on average, and it is important to correct for the surface term in the calibration. We find no significant offset in the ${\nu }_{\max }$ scaling relation, although a clear metallicity dependence is seen and we suggest including a metallicity term in the formulae. Lastly, we calibrate new scaling relations for red giant stars based on observed global seismic parameters, spectroscopic effective temperatures and metallicities, and modeling-inferred masses and radii.
AB - This paper presents a correction to the scaling relations for red giant stars using model-based masses and radii. We measure radial-mode frequencies from Kepler observations for 3642 solar-like oscillators on the red giant branch and use them to characterize the stars with grid-based modeling. We determine fundamental stellar parameters with good precision: the typical uncertainty is 4.5% for mass, 16% for age, 0.006 dex for surface gravity, and 1.7% for radius. We also achieve good accuracy for estimated masses and radii, based on a comparison with those determined for eclipsing binaries. We find a systematic offset of ∼15% in mass and ∼7% in radius between the modeling solutions and the scaling relations. Further investigation indicates that these offsets are mainly caused by a systematic bias in the Δν scaling relation: the original scaling relation underestimates the Δν value by ∼4%, on average, and it is important to correct for the surface term in the calibration. We find no significant offset in the ${\nu }_{\max }$ scaling relation, although a clear metallicity dependence is seen and we suggest including a metallicity term in the formulae. Lastly, we calibrate new scaling relations for red giant stars based on observed global seismic parameters, spectroscopic effective temperatures and metallicities, and modeling-inferred masses and radii.
KW - Asteroseismology
KW - Stellar oscillations
KW - Stellar properties
KW - astro-ph.SR
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126703057&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fbf
DO - 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fbf
M3 - Article
SN - 1538-4357
VL - 927
JO - The Astrophysical Journal
JF - The Astrophysical Journal
IS - 2
M1 - 167
ER -