TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome in male Caucasian and Indo-Asian subjects
AU - Valsamakis, G
AU - Chetty, R
AU - Anwar, Aresh
AU - Banerjee, Ashim
AU - Barnett, Anthony
AU - Kumar, S
PY - 2004/12/1
Y1 - 2004/12/1
N2 - Aims The aims of this study were first, to investigate the relationship between simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat as assessed by a single slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scan in patients attending a hospital clinic. Second, to determine which anthropometric measure best relates to the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome.
Methods Forty-one male subjects [body mass index (BMI): 30.2+5.8 kg/m(2), age: 50.3+13.6 years] were studied by MRI-scan to measure visceral fat at L4/L5 level and to investigate its relationship with simple anthropometric measures. Second, we studied 83 male subjects to determine which anthropometric measure best predicts the metabolic complications (using the ATPIII criteria) of obesity in the setting of a hospital clinic.
Results Waist circumference was the best anthropometric measurement that correlated with MRI-visceral fat mass assessed at L4/L5 in 41 subjects who had an MRI scan (P=0.0001, r(2)=0.36, beta=0.56) amongst variables which also included age, BMI, sagittal diameter, diabetes and ethnicity. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed sagittal diameter (P=0.001, r(2)=0.4, beta=0.406), age (P=0.003, beta=0.271) and waist circumference (P=0.012, beta=0.297) were the best predictors of the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome in all 83 male subjects amongst BMI, waist-hip ratio (WHR), ethnicity and diabetes-related factors.
Conclusions Waist circumference is a simple anthropometric parameter that best correlates with single slice MRI-scan, but sagittal diameter (measured using abdominal calipers) better predicts the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Although there is considerable variation in abdominal fat topography between ethnic groups, and also within populations, sagittal diameter assessment is a technique that is simple and best predicts the metabolic syndrome.
AB - Aims The aims of this study were first, to investigate the relationship between simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat as assessed by a single slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scan in patients attending a hospital clinic. Second, to determine which anthropometric measure best relates to the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome.
Methods Forty-one male subjects [body mass index (BMI): 30.2+5.8 kg/m(2), age: 50.3+13.6 years] were studied by MRI-scan to measure visceral fat at L4/L5 level and to investigate its relationship with simple anthropometric measures. Second, we studied 83 male subjects to determine which anthropometric measure best predicts the metabolic complications (using the ATPIII criteria) of obesity in the setting of a hospital clinic.
Results Waist circumference was the best anthropometric measurement that correlated with MRI-visceral fat mass assessed at L4/L5 in 41 subjects who had an MRI scan (P=0.0001, r(2)=0.36, beta=0.56) amongst variables which also included age, BMI, sagittal diameter, diabetes and ethnicity. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed sagittal diameter (P=0.001, r(2)=0.4, beta=0.406), age (P=0.003, beta=0.271) and waist circumference (P=0.012, beta=0.297) were the best predictors of the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome in all 83 male subjects amongst BMI, waist-hip ratio (WHR), ethnicity and diabetes-related factors.
Conclusions Waist circumference is a simple anthropometric parameter that best correlates with single slice MRI-scan, but sagittal diameter (measured using abdominal calipers) better predicts the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Although there is considerable variation in abdominal fat topography between ethnic groups, and also within populations, sagittal diameter assessment is a technique that is simple and best predicts the metabolic syndrome.
KW - visceral fat
KW - metabolic syndrome
KW - waist circumference
KW - sagittal diameter
KW - single slice MRI-scan
U2 - 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2004.01361.x
DO - 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2004.01361.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 15569138
SN - 0742-3071
VL - 21
SP - 1339
EP - 1345
JO - Diabetic Medicine
JF - Diabetic Medicine
IS - 12
ER -