Assessing good qualitative research in the work psychology field: A response to the commentaries

Catherine Cassell, Gillian Symon

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

This article is a response to three commentaries (Halbesleben, 2011; Hickson, 2011 & Locke, 2011) on 'Assessing "good" qualitative research in the work psychology field: A narrative analysis' (Cassell & Symon, 2011).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)666-668
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing good qualitative research in the work psychology field: A response to the commentaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this