Abstract
Governments and policy-makers have of late displayed renewed attention to behavioural research in an attempt to achieve a range of policy goals, including health promotion. In particular, approaches which could be labelled as 'nudges' have gained traction with policy-makers. A range of objections to nudging have been raised in the literature. These include claims that nudges undermine autonomy and liberty, may lead to a decrease in responsibility in decision-making, lack transparency, involve deception, and involve manipulation, potentially occasioning coercion. In this article I focus on claims of coercion, examining nudges within two of the main approaches to coercion-the pressure approach and the more recent enforcement approach. I argue that coercion entails an element of control over the behaviour of agents which is not plausibly displayed by the kinds of serious examples of nudges posited in the literature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-158 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Monash Bioethics Review |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2014 |
Keywords
- Coercion
- Decision Making
- Health Behavior
- Health Policy
- Health Promotion
- Humans
- Motivation
- Persuasive Communication
- United Kingdom
- Journal Article
- Nudges
- Behavioural research