Anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G levels in vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: persistent positivity through 7 months

Samantha Montague, Christopher Smith, Clare S Lodwick, Charlotte Stoneley, Matthew Roberts, Gillian Lowe, William Lester, Steve Watson, Pip Nicolson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

88 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies that activate platelets via FcγRIIA drive the pathophysiology of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). Evolution of these antibodies and their ability to activate platelets after initial treatment remains unknown.

Objectives: To assess how clinical and platelet parameters, anti-PF4 antibody levels, and patient serum reactivity changes during follow-up after VITT presentation.

Methods: We describe cases of seven discharged VITT patients that were followed from diagnosis up to 280 days (range 199–280) after vaccination. We measured anti-PF4 antibodies and PF4 levels in patient serum during follow-up and tested the ability of patient serum to activate healthy donor platelets and patient platelets over time.

Results: Anti-PF4 immunoglobulin G antibody levels are very high at diagnosis (0.9–2.6 OD) and remain relatively high (>1.0 OD) in all patients, except one treated with rituximab, at 7 months post vaccination. All patients were on direct oral anticoagulants throughout follow-up and no patients had recurrent thrombosis. Patients’ platelets during follow-up have normal FcγRIIA levels and responsiveness to platelet agonists. Patient diagnostic serum strongly activated control platelets, either alone or with PF4. Most follow-up serum alone was weaker at stimulating donor and patient platelets. However, follow-up serum beyond 150 days still strongly activated platelets with PF4 addition in three patients. Patient serum PF4 levels were lower than controls at diagnosis but returned within normal range by day 50.

Conclusions: Explanations for reduced platelet activation during follow-up, despite similar total anti-PF4 antibody levels, remains unclear. Clinical implications of persistent anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT require further study.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12707
Number of pages8
JournalResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr S. Abrams (University of Liverpool) for helpful discussions and Professor A. Richter, Dr A. Shields, and Dr S. Faustini from the COCO study for AZD1222‐vaccinated healthy donor samples. This study is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR135073). This work was also supported by an Accelerator Grant (AA/18/2/34218) from the British Heart Foundation (BHF). S.P.W. holds a BHF Chair (CH03/003). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the DHSC.

Funding Information:
The authors thank Dr S. Abrams (University of Liverpool) for helpful discussions and Professor A. Richter, Dr A. Shields, and Dr S. Faustini from the COCO study for AZD1222-vaccinated healthy donor samples. This study is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (NIHR135073). This work was also supported by an Accelerator Grant (AA/18/2/34218) from the British Heart Foundation (BHF). S.P.W. holds a BHF Chair (CH03/003). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the DHSC.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH).

Keywords

  • anti-PF4 antibodies
  • AZD1222 vaccination
  • FcγRIIA
  • thrombosis
  • VITT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anti-platelet factor 4 immunoglobulin G levels in vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: persistent positivity through 7 months'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this