Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

67 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	419-441
Number of pages	23
Journal	Public Understanding of Science
Volume	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506075351
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2008

Access to Document

@article{12313a12c2324bd783d56515db82ac89,

title = "Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations",

author = "G Rowe and T Horlick-Jones and John Walls and W Poortinga and N Pidgeon",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0963662506075351",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "419--441",

journal = "Public Understanding of Science",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations

AU - Rowe, G

AU - Horlick-Jones, T

AU - Walls, John

AU - Poortinga, W

AU - Pidgeon, N

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

U2 - 10.1177/0963662506075351

DO - 10.1177/0963662506075351

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 419

EP - 441

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

ER -