An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor

Martin Gore, Allan Hackshaw, William E Brady, Richard T Penson, Richard Zaino, W Glenn McCluggage, Raji Ganesan, Nafisa Wilkinson, Timothy Perren, Ana Montes, Jeffrey Summers, Rosemary Lord, Graham Dark, Gordon Rustin, Melanie Mackean, Nicholas Reed, Sean Kehoe, Michael Frumovitz, Helen Christensen, Amanda FeeneyJonathan Ledermann, David M Gershenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated four different treatment regimens for advanced-stage mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized factorial trial (UK and US). Patients were diagnosed with primary mEOC: FIGO stage II-IV or recurrence after stage I disease. Treatment arms were paclitaxel-carboplatin, oxaliplatin-capecitabine, paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab, or oxaliplatin-capecitabine-bevacizumab. Chemotherapy was given 3-weekly for 6 cycles, and bevacizumab (3-weekly) was continued as maintenance (for 12 cycles). Endpoints included overall-survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS: The trial stopped after 50 patients were recruited due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 59 months. OS hazard ratios (HR) for the two main comparisons were: 0.78 (p = 0.48) for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo (each with/without bevacizumab), and 1.04 (p = 0.92) for bevacizumab vs. no bevacizumab. Corresponding PFS HRs were: 0.84 and 0.80. Retrospective central pathology review revealed only 45% (18/40) cases with available material had confirmed primary mEOC. Among these, OS HR for Oxal-Cape vs. Pac-Carbo was 0.36 (p = 0.14); PFS HR = 0.62 (p = 0.40). Grade 3-4 toxicity was seen in 61% Pac-Carbo, 61% Oxal-Cape, 54% Pac-Carbo-Bev, and 85% Oxal-Cape-Bev. QoL was similar between the four arms.

CONCLUSION: mEOC/GOG0241 represents an example of a randomized rare tumor trial. Logistical challenges led to early termination, including difficulties in local histopathological diagnosis and accessing drugs outside their labelled indication. There was misalignment between central funders who support clinical trials in rare cancers and the deprioritisation of such work by those managing and funding research at a local level. Rare cancer trials should include centralised pathology review before treatment. Clinical trial registry number: ISRCTN83438782.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-548
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic oncology
Volume153
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
  • Bevacizumab/administration & dosage
  • Capecitabine/administration & dosage
  • Carboplatin/administration & dosage
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Internationality
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
  • Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy
  • Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
  • Oxaliplatin/administration & dosage
  • Paclitaxel/administration & dosage
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Quality of Life
  • Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
  • Survival Rate
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An international, phase III randomized trial in patients with mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC/GOG 0241) with long-term follow-up: and experience of conducting a clinical trial in a rare gynecological tumor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this