An integrative review considering the impact of storytelling and sharing interventions in stroke

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

33 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Review-based research is needed which can establish the psychosocial outcomes and mechanisms of "storytelling and sharing" interventions for people with stroke. This information will act to inform the value and development of such interventions.

METHODS: An integrative review was conducted in three stages: (a) a systematic search strategy was undertaken to focus on articles between 2009 until January 2020 to locate articles the considered storytelling and sharing interventions for people diagnosed with stroke; (b) critical appraisal was undertaken to assess study quality; and (c) synthesis within three stages including data reduction, data display and conclusion.

RESULTS: Fourteen articles (including 727 participants) were identified that met the eligibility criteria. Five themes were identified that represented the outcome and mechanisms that appeared to be associated with a stroke intervention. These included introducing the concept of hope and learning to be positive, the enhanced ability to cope, the impact of loneliness and social interaction, impact on emotions, depression and related emotions such as fear.

CONCLUSIONS: Storytelling interventions appear to impact loneliness, introduce positivity and hope and enable coping through knowledge exchange. The main mechanisms which appeared to influence these outcomes were social comparisons and social control.

Original languageEnglish
Article number88
Number of pages15
JournalBehavioral Sciences
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Jun 2021

Keywords

  • stroke
  • storytelling
  • narrative
  • peer support
  • group dynamic
  • group process
  • group
  • sharing
  • psychosocial well-being
  • emotion
  • integrative review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An integrative review considering the impact of storytelling and sharing interventions in stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this