Abstract
Objective: To describe a nationwide Patient-held Health Booklet system and investigate its use and completeness for clinical information transfer during chronic non-communicable disease (NCD) outpatient visits in Mongolia.
Design: Cross-sectional survey and document review.
Setting: Two large government secondary-care hospital outpatient departments (OPD) in Ulaanbaatar.
Participants: 395 adult outpatients attending for NCDs.
Outcome measure: Numbers of patient-held records brought and used by OPD doctors; Completeness of records on arrival and leaving OPD.
Results: 96% (379) brought handover documentation from previous provider/s: 94% had patient-held health Booklets, 27% other additional documents and 4% had nothing. 67% were referred from primary-care and 44% referred back for follow-up. On leaving the OPD, 93% were provided with written clinical information in the Booklet and 39% were also given other documents. 84% recalled being given verbal information. Only 40.8% of the records of the OPD consultation with written information included all three key handover information items (diagnosis, management/treatment and follow-up). The Booklets were the best completed type of document, with evidence that they were consulted by patients (80%), public (95%) and private (77%) providers. Living >1 hour away (OR=0.28; 95%CI 0.13, 0.61) decreased the likelihood of receiving written management/treatment information; living >1 hour away (OR=0.48; 95%CI 0.27, 0.87), comorbidity (OR=0.55; 95%CI 0.35, 0.87), and returning to secondary-care for follow-up (OR=0.52; 95%CI 0.33, 0.80) all independently decreased the likelihood of receiving written follow-up information. A Ministry order mandates the use of the patient-held health Booklet, but there were no other policies, guidelines or clinician training relating to their use.
Conclusions: The universal Patient-Held Health Booklets were well-accepted, well-utilised and the best completed handover documentation. The Booklets provided a successful handover option for chronic NCD patients in Mongolia but their completeness needs improving. There is potential for their application globally.
Design: Cross-sectional survey and document review.
Setting: Two large government secondary-care hospital outpatient departments (OPD) in Ulaanbaatar.
Participants: 395 adult outpatients attending for NCDs.
Outcome measure: Numbers of patient-held records brought and used by OPD doctors; Completeness of records on arrival and leaving OPD.
Results: 96% (379) brought handover documentation from previous provider/s: 94% had patient-held health Booklets, 27% other additional documents and 4% had nothing. 67% were referred from primary-care and 44% referred back for follow-up. On leaving the OPD, 93% were provided with written clinical information in the Booklet and 39% were also given other documents. 84% recalled being given verbal information. Only 40.8% of the records of the OPD consultation with written information included all three key handover information items (diagnosis, management/treatment and follow-up). The Booklets were the best completed type of document, with evidence that they were consulted by patients (80%), public (95%) and private (77%) providers. Living >1 hour away (OR=0.28; 95%CI 0.13, 0.61) decreased the likelihood of receiving written management/treatment information; living >1 hour away (OR=0.48; 95%CI 0.27, 0.87), comorbidity (OR=0.55; 95%CI 0.35, 0.87), and returning to secondary-care for follow-up (OR=0.52; 95%CI 0.33, 0.80) all independently decreased the likelihood of receiving written follow-up information. A Ministry order mandates the use of the patient-held health Booklet, but there were no other policies, guidelines or clinician training relating to their use.
Conclusions: The universal Patient-Held Health Booklets were well-accepted, well-utilised and the best completed handover documentation. The Booklets provided a successful handover option for chronic NCD patients in Mongolia but their completeness needs improving. There is potential for their application globally.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 729-740 |
| Journal | BMJ Quality & Safety |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| Early online date | 26 Apr 2019 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Clinical handover
- Health systems
- Patient safety
- Quality improvement
- Non-communicable diseases
- Mongolia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of Mongolia’s universal patient-held health booklets as a tool for continuity of care in chronic disease patients: a cross-sectional study: Can universal patient-held booklets promote continuity of care and patient-centred care in low resource countries? The case of Mongolia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver