Abstract
We review the ambiguous legacy of Emil Kraepelin. He established an approach that secured psychiatry’s place as a medical specialty, and his methodology has dominated the profession and defined its long 20th century, 1899–2026. However, his eugenic views weigh heavily because of the catastrophes in which German psychiatry was implicated and to which it contributed actively during the Nazi era that followed. Furthermore, his project to establish mental illness in the form of discrete natural kinds has failed in the light of scientific progress. Psychiatry must embrace the complexity of mental illness and engage more deeply with the inherently fuzzy realms of language, culture, technological change and political power. This shift should bear more strongly on psychiatry’s curriculum, research priorities, continuing professional development, practice, ethics and public engagement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 8-10 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | British Journal of Psychiatry |
| Volume | 229 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 11 Dec 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- ecology of brain and psychiatry
- Medical model
- psychiatric curriculum and research
- psychiatric diagnosis
- subjectivity
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An Emil Kraepelin centenary: psychiatry’s long 20th century, 1899–2026 and after'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver