Abstract
"Whistle-blowing" is an increasingly common element of regulatory enforcement programs and one that is encouraged by recent legislation in the United States and elsewhere. We examine how responsive regulators should be to whistle-blower tip-offs and how severe should penalties be for wrongdoers detected in this way. Competing psychological theories as to what motivates employees to become whistle-blowers are operationalized as alternative behavioral heuristics. Optimal policy depends upon the motives attributed to whistle-blowers - which of the theories you subscribe to - but is not in general characterized by maximal penalties nor routine pursuit of complaints, even when pursuit is costless.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 157-182 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2009 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Law