AMHP Work: Dirty or Prestigious? Dirty Work Designations and the Approved Mental Health Professional

Lisa Morriss*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper explores the notion of 'dirty work' in relation to the newly created role of the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP). An AMHP undertakes various duties set out in the 1983 Mental Health Act, as amended by the 2007 Act, in relation to assessments to make applications for compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. It has been argued that undertaking this social control function is 'dirty work'. However, the findings from a study of social work AMHPs in England suggest that the picture is more complex. Extracts from narrative interviews are analysed using dialogical narrative analysis. Rather than being designated as dirty work, AMHP duty was presented as prestigious and as advanced social work. However, through their storytelling, the social workers clearly delineated the aspects of AMHP work that they did designate as dirty, specifically the lack of beds, the complexities of co-ordination and the emotional labour which is an inherent part of the work.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)703-718
    Number of pages16
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
    Volume46
    Issue number3
    Early online date26 Feb 2015
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2016

    Keywords

    • Approved Mental Health Professional
    • dirty work
    • mental health
    • social work

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health(social science)
    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'AMHP Work: Dirty or Prestigious? Dirty Work Designations and the Approved Mental Health Professional'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this